Per Jessen wrote: ... > Maybe introducing autoconf into the build? Please don't: applications that use libtool tend to only build on "GNU's Not Unix". Besides, if the code is written in $language -- as opposed to GNU$language, most of autoconf's checks are unnecessary cruft. Perhaps if someone rewrites analog in gunk (aka gnuc) it'll need an automagical check if c compiler can create excutables and isn't missing stdio.h. But as it stands now, it ain't broken to begin with.
Dima +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
