Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: > ... >> Maybe introducing autoconf into the build? > > Please don't: applications that use libtool tend to only build on > "GNU's Not Unix". Besides, if the code is written in $language -- as > opposed to GNU$language, most of autoconf's checks are unnecessary > cruft. Perhaps if someone rewrites analog in gunk (aka gnuc) it'll > need an automagical check if c compiler can create excutables and > isn't missing stdio.h. But as it stands now, it ain't broken to begin > with.
Alright, then perhaps not autoconf itself, but the general "edit the header file" configuration method is a little dated, so some kind of assisted config tool would come in handy. /Per Jessen, Zürich +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
