OK, there are lots of things here, but the first important thing to say is that logfile analysis and page tagging will never match up. They use fundamentally different techniques, and each makes errors that the other is not susceptible to. For page views you would normally expect to see the logfile analysis numbers lower, because page tagging will see the page again if the visitor returns to it, but logfile analysis won't.
You do have too many corrupt lines. If you turn debugging on, you will see all the corrupt lines, and where in the line they were corrupt. It looks like you have about 100,000 of these strange ".s=tl" lines, right? Page tagging may be including them as pages, depending what they really are and whether they are tagged, so it may be worth tracking them down in the logfiles. Sorry, no great insights, but at least that might give you some avenues to look down. -- Stephen Turner +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
