Methodology:
1. take the last 30 days of sampled logs
2. look for IE6
3. count proportionately for (all requests|all text/html requests)

The results: of /both HTTPS and http/ requests, ~0.20% come from IE6; of
all text/html requests, 1.3%. I'd note that this is likely to be an
/over/estimate; there are some browsers which spoof IE6 that'll be included
in these numbers, but would be excluded from e.g. Christian's.[0] On the
HTTPS front, Christian's numbers, I trust - checking for HTTPs didn't work
for me, since the terminators aren't actually included in the sampled
logs.[1] Full results and codebase at https://github.com/Ironholds/POODLE

[0] I knowingly used a crappy ua parsing strategy because it was also a *really
fast* ua parsing strategy, and 30 days of logs, even sampled logs, ain't
nothing.
[1] This doesn't apply to Christian's results; he took the terminator IPs
and checked for requests from those ranges. Sensible!

On 15 October 2014 16:50, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Darnit. Ah well! Okay; finished building the code to retrieve this data.
> Takes ~400 seconds to handle a day of logs, so take into account
> parallelisation and I should (should!) have something to show in a couple
> of hours for the first 3 Qs. The fourth, it seems, is beyond our ken.
>
> On 15 October 2014 15:54, Max Semenik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There's no data for IE6 in EventLogging because IE6 gets no JS these
>> days. Maybe, if there's old enough data...
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Update: Yuvi's pointed me towards a login attempts schema. All 4 are
>>> doable. Data tomorrow morning EST at the latest.
>>>
>>> On 15 October 2014 15:19, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (With "jiffy" read "a day"; even with sampling, big logs are big, and I
>>>> imagine we probably want ~30 days of data.)
>>>>
>>>> On 15 October 2014 15:18, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> First three are pretty trivial; last one is a bit of a pain, but
>>>>> doable if someone wants to poke me on IRC (/query Ironholds) and chat 
>>>>> about
>>>>> what an unambiguous successful login action would look like in terms of
>>>>> requests. But I can do the first three in a jiffy.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 October 2014 13:32, Brandon Black <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You invoked my name!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Emphasis is "logged-in". If you guys want more solid *overall*
>>>>>>> numbers, I can get those in short order; this seems like a pretty 
>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>> question to have data on, fast. Lemme know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can source some good reliable numbers, probably what we care
>>>>>> about (all of which have been estimated to some degree in this thread
>>>>>> already, I think?) is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> % of all requests from IE6
>>>>>> % of all https requests from IE6
>>>>>> % of all text/html https requests from IE6 (not so important IMHO, if
>>>>>> it's difficult)
>>>>>> % of all logged-in https requests (or alternatively, % of all
>>>>>> successful https login attempts) from IE6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Oliver Keyes
>>>>> Research Analyst
>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Oliver Keyes
>>>> Research Analyst
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oliver Keyes
>>> Research Analyst
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Analytics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Oliver Keyes
> Research Analyst
> Wikimedia Foundation
>



-- 
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to