I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.
As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any problems with this parameter name? -Adam On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > Ping ... (regarding cache question) > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2. What about caching? >>> Is this page:* http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value >>> <http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value>* being served >>> from the cache as it should be? >>> >> >> The file download parameter was handled via this patch: >> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ >> Seems like an analogous scenario. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
