Oof, only that it is ugly! :) Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: > > I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 > <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606> about modeling after that patch. > That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation. > > As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. > Any problems with this parameter name? > > -Adam > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Ping ... (regarding cache question) > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > 2. What about caching? > Is this page: http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value > <http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value> being served from > the cache as it should be? > > The file download parameter was handled via this patch: > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ > <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/> > Seems like an analogous scenario. > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics> > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
