The former might be slightly easier to cache, and can be linked to / pulled in statically, without a need to dynamically construct a URL. Would it be hard to offer both?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote: > It's getting exciting. :-) > > I'd go with choice 2 since it gives more control to the user while > offering what the user can get through choice 1 as well. > > Question: will we get page_ids or page_titles or both? It's good to have > both. > > Leila > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone. End of quarter is rapidly approaching and I wanted to ask a >> quick question about one of the endpoints we want to push out. We want to >> let you ask "what are the top articles" but we're not sure how to structure >> the URL so it's most useful to you. Here are the choices: >> >> Choice 1. /top/{project}/{access}/{days-in-the-past} >> >> Example: top articles via all en.wikipedia sites for the past 30 days: >> /top/en.wikipedia/all-access/30 >> >> >> Choice 2. /top/{project}/{access}/{start}/{end} >> >> Example: top articles via all en.wikipedia sites from June 12th, 2014 to >> August 30th, 2015: /top/en.wikipedia/all-access/2014-06-12/2015-08-30 >> >> >> (in all of those, >> >> * {project} means en.wikipedia, commons.wikimedia, etc. >> * {access} means access method as in desktop, mobile web, mobile app >> >> ) >> >> Which do you prefer? Would any other query style be useful? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- Gabriel Wicke Principal Engineer, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
