+1 Adam Also, maybe *top-articles* instead of *top*, to avoid naming collision in the future?
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd be in favor of both. Maybe with a little tweak to the pathing: > > /top/{project}/{access}/days/{days-in-the-past} > > /top/{project}/{access}/range/{start}/{end} > > with "days" or "range" maybe being earlier in the forward slash separated > spec if it doesn't read well semantically. > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> It wouldn't be too hard to offer both, but I'm thinking it might be >> confusing for a consumer. I think ultimately the decision should be up to >> the people using this data, because the use cases are fairly different for >> each form. If people ask for both, we'll do both. >> >> Leila, we'd love to have page_ids as well, but we'd have to block the >> release on a bigger effort to reliably mirror mediawiki databases in Hadoop >> for processing, so we'll probably punt on that for now. But we have more >> than many reasons to work on that sooner than later. >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Gabriel Wicke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The former might be slightly easier to cache, and can be linked to / >>> pulled in statically, without a need to dynamically construct a URL. Would >>> it be hard to offer both? >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It's getting exciting. :-) >>>> >>>> I'd go with choice 2 since it gives more control to the user while >>>> offering what the user can get through choice 1 as well. >>>> >>>> Question: will we get page_ids or page_titles or both? It's good to >>>> have both. >>>> >>>> Leila >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia >>>> .org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone. End of quarter is rapidly approaching and I wanted to >>>>> ask a quick question about one of the endpoints we want to push out. We >>>>> want to let you ask "what are the top articles" but we're not sure how to >>>>> structure the URL so it's most useful to you. Here are the choices: >>>>> >>>>> Choice 1. /top/{project}/{access}/{days-in-the-past} >>>>> >>>>> Example: top articles via all en.wikipedia sites for the past 30 days: >>>>> /top/en.wikipedia/all-access/30 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Choice 2. /top/{project}/{access}/{start}/{end} >>>>> >>>>> Example: top articles via all en.wikipedia sites from June 12th, 2014 >>>>> to August 30th, 2015: /top/en.wikipedia/all-access/2014-06-12/2015-08-30 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (in all of those, >>>>> >>>>> * {project} means en.wikipedia, commons.wikimedia, etc. >>>>> * {access} means access method as in desktop, mobile web, mobile app >>>>> >>>>> ) >>>>> >>>>> Which do you prefer? Would any other query style be useful? >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Analytics mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Analytics mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Gabriel Wicke >>> Principal Engineer, Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- *Marcel Ruiz Forns* Analytics Developer Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
