Hi all,

It seems comments are decreasing at this point. I'd like to slowly drive
this thread to a conclusion.


3. Create a plan to block clients that dont implement the (amended)
> User-Agent policy.


I think we can decide on this later. Steps 1) and 2) can be done first -
they should be done anyway before 3) - and then we can see how much benefit
we raise from them. If we don't get a satisfactory reaction from
bot/framework maintainers, we then can go for 3). John, would you be OK
with that?


If no-one else raises concerns about this, the Analytics team will:

   1. Add a mention to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User-Agent_policy,
   to encourage including the word "bot" (case-insensitive) in the User-Agent
   string, so that bots can be easily identified.

   2. Advertise the convention and reach out to bot/framework maintainers
   to increase the share of bots that implement the User-Agent policy.


Thanks!

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Bryan Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>It will take time for frameworks to implement an amended User-Agent
> policy.
> >>For example, pywikipedia (pywikibot compat) is not actively
> >>maintained.
> > That doesn't imply we shouldn't have a  policy that anyone can refer to,
> > these bots will not follow it until they get some maintainers.
> >
> >>There was a task filled against Analytics for this, but Dan Andreescu
> >>removed Analytics (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99373#1859170).
> >
> > Sorry that the tagging is confusing. I think Analytics tag was removed
> cause
> > this is a request for data and our team doesn't do data retrieval. We
> > normally tag with "analytics" phabricator items that have actionables for
> > our team.
> > I am cc-ing Bryan who has already done some analysis on bots requests to
> the
> > API and can probably provide some data.
>
> It would be possible to make some relative comparisons of pywikibot
> versions using the data that is currently collected in the
> wmf.webrequest data set. "Someday" I'll get T108618 [0] finished which
> will make answering some of the more granular questions in T99373
> easier. Kunal talked with Brad and I a few weeks ago when we were all
> in SF for the DevSummit about other instrumentation that could be put
> in place specifically for pywikibot so that something like
> Special:ApiFeatureUsage [2] could be created for pywikibot version
> tracking as well. This all seems like a fork of the topic at hand
> however.
>
> [0]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T108618
> [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99373
> [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiFeatureUsage
>
> Bryan
> --
> Bryan Davis              Wikimedia Foundation    <[email protected]>
> [[m:User:BDavis_(WMF)]]  Sr Software Engineer            Boise, ID USA
> irc: bd808                                        v:415.839.6885 x6855
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>



-- 
*Marcel Ruiz Forns*
Analytics Developer
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to