I wrote about the "Great interwiki migration" in 2015 and you can find the
post at
https://addshore.com/2015/06/review-of-the-big-interwiki-link-migration/

On 11 October 2016 at 11:08, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Wikistats knows about 8017 bot usernames according to
> https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-ez/wikistats/csv_wp_main.zip
> (cut -f2 -d, StatisticsBots.csv | sort -u | wc -l ). Given active editors
> tend to complain a lot if they get counted as bots, a comprehensive list
> should probably be a superset of that one.
>
> Flöck, Fabian, 11/10/2016 11:15:
>
>> This is likely not news, so can someone enlighten me regarding what
>> brought about that sharp decline of bot edits?
>>
>
> The migration of interwiki links to Wikidata, which is very visible in
> https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/PlotsPngEditHistoryTop.htm .
>
> There was also some statistic by WMF on whether active users had
> "migrated" to Wikidata from other projects, but I can't quickly find it
> now; maybe it was around the time of http://infodisiac.com/blog/201
> 4/03/wikimedia-editor-trends-broken-down-by-project/ .
>
> Nemo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>



-- 
Addshore
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to