Hi Rafael,

The exact data you're looking for, as mentioned by Nuria, is not readily
available for sharing. If you find it useful, I'm happy to set up a call
with you to understand what your needs are (I've read the details of
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T131889 already) and brainstorm with you
about other innovative ways you can use Wikipedia/Wikimedia data for the
purposes of these reports. If that's of interest, please ping me off-list.

Best,
Leila



Leila Zia
Senior Research Scientist
Wikimedia Foundation

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rafael,
>
> The most recent data we have on this regard publicy available has already
> been linked on this thread. Sorry we do not have more current data, as I
> pointed out couple times before we will likely have newer data by April
> 2017 when our ongoing project regarding edit data reconstruction (we
> expect) would be mostly completed.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Nuria
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Rafael Escalona Reynoso <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Federico,
>> Thank you for your reply. I have been in touch with the Analytics team
>> making inquiries about this data. Is there a particular person I should
>> forward my request within WMF? Can you please provide me with a contact
>> there?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Rafael Escalona Reynoso, PhD, MPA.
>> Lead Researcher at The Global Innovation Index
>> Cornell College of Business
>> Cornell University
>> Ithaca, NY 14853
>>
>> Phone: +1 (607) 262-0983
>> Email:  [email protected]
>> www.globalinnovationindex.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Federico Leva (Nemo) [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2017 12:07 PM
>> To: Rafael Escalona Reynoso; A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF
>> and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
>> Cc: Jordan Litner; Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha
>> Subject: Re: [Analytics] On Wikipedia edits archive per county.
>>
>> Probably someone at WMF would be more appropriate for a call; I can only
>> share information which is online.
>>
>> Rafael Escalona Reynoso, 02/01/2017 17:40:
>> > Thank you for your reply. While reviewing both tables, the process to
>> > define the total number of edits per country is still a bit ambiguous.
>> > For example, in the case of Spanish, edits can be allocated to various
>> > countries.
>>
>> Sorry, I should have been clearer. What you need is the language
>> breakdown,
>> like this (which was last calculated in 2013, it seems):
>> https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportPage
>> EditsPerLanguageBreakdown.htm
>>
>> If you only consider the numbers above 3 % or so, these tend to be rather
>> stable, so the 2013 data is still a good approximation.
>>
>> > In
>> > addition not all quarters for 2015 are available.
>> >
>> > Would it be possible to obtain instead the overall number of edits per
>> > country for the year 2015?
>>
>> Ah sorry, I thought you wanted historical data more than recent data.
>> Updates have been stalled by WMF while they work on a potential
>> replacement,
>> so I suspect you can only adapt older data or wait.
>>
>> Nemo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to