Thanks, Marcel. Rafael, Jordan and I, and later Dan, Nuria, and I met 2 days ago and next steps are followed on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T131889. I will update this list if something beyond that ticket's activity should be reported on my end.
Best, Leila On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that last email in this thread was retained by the mailing list > filter for 6 days, because the sender was not subscribed to the list. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Rafael Escalona Reynoso <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Dear Leila, >> Thank you for your reply. Can we schedule a call for tomorrow or Monday >> morning? Let me know what times work for you best. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Rafael Escalona Reynoso. >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:21 PM Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> The exact data you're looking for, as mentioned by Nuria, is not readily >>> available for sharing. If you find it useful, I'm happy to set up a call >>> with you to understand what your needs are (I've read the details of >>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T131889 already) and brainstorm with >>> you about other innovative ways you can use Wikipedia/Wikimedia data for >>> the purposes of these reports. If that's of interest, please ping me >>> off-list. >>> >>> Best, >>> Leila >>> >>> >>> >>> Leila Zia >>> Senior Research Scientist >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Rafael, >>> >>> The most recent data we have on this regard publicy available has >>> already been linked on this thread. Sorry we do not have more current data, >>> as I pointed out couple times before we will likely have newer data by >>> April 2017 when our ongoing project regarding edit data reconstruction (we >>> expect) would be mostly completed. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> Nuria >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Rafael Escalona Reynoso < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Federico, >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your reply. I have been in touch with the Analytics team >>> >>> >>> making inquiries about this data. Is there a particular person I should >>> >>> >>> forward my request within WMF? Can you please provide me with a contact >>> >>> >>> there? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Rafael Escalona Reynoso, PhD, MPA. >>> >>> >>> Lead Researcher at The Global Innovation Index >>> >>> >>> Cornell College of Business >>> >>> >>> Cornell University >>> >>> >>> Ithaca, NY 14853 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Phone: +1 (607) 262-0983 >>> >>> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> www.globalinnovationindex.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> >>> From: Federico Leva (Nemo) [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2017 12:07 PM >>> >>> >>> To: Rafael Escalona Reynoso; A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF >>> >>> >>> and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics. >>> >>> >>> Cc: Jordan Litner; Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha >>> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [Analytics] On Wikipedia edits archive per county. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Probably someone at WMF would be more appropriate for a call; I can only >>> >>> >>> share information which is online. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Rafael Escalona Reynoso, 02/01/2017 17:40: >>> >>> >>> > Thank you for your reply. While reviewing both tables, the process to >>> >>> >>> > define the total number of edits per country is still a bit ambiguous. >>> >>> >>> > For example, in the case of Spanish, edits can be allocated to various >>> >>> >>> > countries. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry, I should have been clearer. What you need is the language >>> breakdown, >>> >>> >>> like this (which was last calculated in 2013, it seems): >>> >>> >>> https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportPage >>> EditsPerLanguageBreakdown.htm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> If you only consider the numbers above 3 % or so, these tend to be rather >>> >>> >>> stable, so the 2013 data is still a good approximation. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > In >>> >>> >>> > addition not all quarters for 2015 are available. >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > Would it be possible to obtain instead the overall number of edits per >>> >>> >>> > country for the year 2015? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ah sorry, I thought you wanted historical data more than recent data. >>> >>> >>> Updates have been stalled by WMF while they work on a potential >>> replacement, >>> >>> >>> so I suspect you can only adapt older data or wait. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Nemo >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> Analytics mailing list >>> >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> Analytics mailing list >>> >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > > -- > *Marcel Ruiz Forns* > Analytics Developer > Wikimedia Foundation >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
