I think that it is inappropriate to apologize for thinking someone was
a woman.  I suppose you are thinking, "Hey, I would apologize if I
thought he was a man, man."  And then I might be writing something
like, "I think it is inappropriate to apologize for thinking someone
was a man."  I do not think there is anything wrong with being either
a man or a woman or a man who seems like a woman or a woman that seems
like a man so I do not think you should apologize.

I think you should just say, "What a trip! I thought you were a (man |
woman | man/woman | woman/man | man\boy).  I must be an idiot."

On Apr 19, 12:32 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You still sound like a woma though. :)
>
> On Apr 19, 1:31 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry!
>
> > On Apr 19, 12:52 pm, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No, I'm not a woman. That's okay, I get that a lot from neurotic people.
>
> > > Hugs and Kisses,
> > > Shane
>
> > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I would  venture to say that Shane Isbell is a woman. (Shane, if you
> > > > are a guy sorry, is just that your writing is so girlish.)
>
> > > > On Apr 19, 11:05 am, luckydroid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > two or three cents:
>
> > > > > I think the speculation on the message boards is funny. I enjoyed
> > > > > engaging in it and adding my own set of neuroses to the lot (mine was
> > > > > around whether we would *ever* know the numbers. I thought Muthu said
> > > > > they were going to keep it *permanently* secret and that was killing
> > > > > me!). What was funnier were requests for (further!) deadline
> > > > > extensions, special considerations, etc... (admittedly it reminded me
> > > > > of a couple of instances around exam times in college..)
>
> > > > > I want to take an informal poll: Are there ANY women here? Besides me?
> > > > > There must be more than the one I am aware of? Out of 1,788 teams??
> > > > > This is some sad representation.
>
> > > > > And I can't even be the stereotype breaker with some uber-geek street
> > > > > cred. status since I am a concept person, i.a. and u.i. designer
> > > > > ( relatively geeky but not here ) . A pixel pusher, picture maker who
> > > > > is allergic to code. A techie to non-techies, a designer to techies
> > > > > (like my Challenge partner who had to show me how to log into Unix on
> > > > > my Mac to see the builds, since I hadn't seen a non- gui for 10
> > > > > years).
>
> > > > > Ah, well. One can only be good at what one is good at, (whether it
> > > > > breaks stereotypes or not!) and hope their killer application rocks
> > > > > the Android Challenge, right?
>
> > > > > -m.a.c.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to