In fact, that's why we implemented the option to send an image stored in the emulator.
IMO documentation is enough clear to realize that sending a square bouncing will just do nothing :)... But I've just received 7 diferent images of the square bouncing... I don't really know if we have any possibility to be in the top-50, but I least, I would like to see that judges are testing our application properly... regards, On 4/28/08, Kevin Galligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yeah. It uses a square. The judges use the same emulator you did. > Did you provide instructions on how to hack the emulator to not do > that (if possible)? Part of my app uses the cam, and a bouncing > sqaure certainly isn't what its for, but I expect to see bouncing > squares get sent back to my server app. I'd be worried if I didn't > get that. Not to be harsh, but I'm confused on what pics you were > expecting. > > I don't know the rules on hacking the emulator (stuff data into the > file system or whatever). They may not do that, although if > reasonable and absolutely necessary, and the docs are very, very > clear, I imagine they would. Don't quote me on that, though. > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Pepel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In fact, our application uses the android camera. As you may know the > > android camera is not (properly) emulated, it's just a square bouncing > the > > screen... so if they test our application with just a snapshot of this > > square, they won't see what our application does... > > > > So, in fact, I'm worried because the judges have connected to our server > > seven times just using a photo of the square bouncing... > > > > regards, > > > > > > On 4/28/08, Kevin Galligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Several threads talked about this over the weekend. You'll get some > > > hits that are just "spot checks". However, you may be able to get > > > some news as to actual reviews on your submission on this board. > > > > > > I don't know if you have recourse with regards to judges not following > > > instructions. My first review didn't really either, but did click > > > around for a while and got the general idea (I assume). > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Pepel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > dear all, > > > > > > > > I'm a bit worried because we submitted an application to the Android > > > > Developer Challenge (a client-server one)... And I'm seeing that the > > judges > > > > are not testing the application correctly(watching the server > > logs...)... I > > > > don't know if they have not read the documentation, or they do not > have > > > > it... > > > > > > > > Does anybody know how to contact the ADC responsible of that? > > > > > > > > thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Pepel > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Pepel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Pepel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
