Its all speculation and guesses. No one knows except for Google. And we all must trust Google will do the right thing in the end.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:54 PM, arnouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I read on different thread here : > - judges read the first page of our manual > - can look the video that we sent (I don't attach video, it was too > big..and well...) > - if judge is interesting by the doc, he could launch the application > to look the UI, but not really for testing > - I had a connexion on my web server from California (OK it could be > good) > - but nobody has subscribed on the website to test the application > (synchronization between application and web server) > > I've no proof that my app is out, but sincerely...I'm not anymore > enthousiasm ! do you have a proof that I'm or not in 100 !! :) > > Regards, > Arnaud > > On May 1, 4:18 pm, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > arnouf, > > > > Where did you get this idea, that the judges are not testing your > > application in a fair way? Do you have any concrete proof that your > > application was wasted? > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:33 PM, arnouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > So If I understand well. 100 applications have been selected without > > > to be tested!! > > > Wow...So, If I no connection on my server before monday, I think that > > > my apps is already out! > > > > > I thought that to test application we must read documentation, test > > > application... > > > > > 5 months to develop a server and an Android application without to be > > > tested...It's a little bit hard to understand! > > > > > Arnaud > > > > > On May 1, 2:27 pm, "Kevin Galligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 10 minutes. But you have to read docs. Then you test. Then scores. > > > > Then I'd bet you have to write something about the app. Then you get > > > > an email from your buddy about something... > > > > > > 10 minutes is not a lot of time. > > > > > > Now, Muthu. you may be right. But why are you insisting you are with > > > > no real info? You're like my stepfather. > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Muthu Ramadoss < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Agree, it would be like 10 mins. 30 mins is just too long to > evaluate > > > any > > > > > application. > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > So assuming that each judge spends a minimum of 30 minutes > judging > > > an > > > > > > > application > > > > > > > > I'm thinking more like 10 mins...perhaps maybe a couple more > between > > > > > > applications to wipe data and do a fresh install... > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 11:56 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > OK, this is why I think that they will not make the May 5th > > > deadline. > > > > > > > Dan M. said that there are around 100 judges, also, he > mentioned > > > that > > > > > > > each judge had about 76 applications. Now, if there are 1788 > > > > > > > applications and each application has four judges then that > means > > > that > > > > > > > there are effectively 1788*4=7152 entries to judge. > > > > > > > You hear that, they are judgin 7152 applications. Since there > are > > > > > > > only 100 judges then each judge gets 7152/100=72 applications. > > > Which > > > > > > > is very close to the 76 applications. > > > > > > > > > So assuming that each judge spends a minimum of 30 minutes > judging > > > an > > > > > > > application he will need (76*30)/60= 38 hours to judge all of > > > them. > > > > > > > But judges are not machines, so between their real work, > > > distractions, > > > > > > > and having to stop and go with every new application I would > > > double > > > > > > > this time which is still very agreesive. So they need 76 hours > > > each to > > > > > > > judge the applications. That is almost two weeks of full time > > > work. > > > > > > > Unless we assume that they are doing nothing else I think it > is a > > > bit > > > > > > > of a strech to say that they will finish on time. > > > > > > > > > On May 1, 2:34 am, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The judging has reached the final stage. The top 100 had > been > > > filtered > > > > > out > > > > > > > > of 1788 apps. The judges are busy now selecting the final 50 > > > winners > > > > > out of > > > > > > > > the top 100. > > > > > > > > > > Good luck droids! > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Incognito < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So Dan (or anybody at google), > > > > > > > > > > > How far are you guys into the judging? The suspense is > killing > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > take care, > > > > > > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > > > > >http://mobeegal.in > > > > > > > > > > find stuff closer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > -- > > > > > take care, > > > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > >http://mobeegal.in > > > > > find stuff closer. > > > > -- > > take care, > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > http://mobeegal.in > > find stuff closer. > > > -- take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://mobeegal.in find stuff closer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
