For the record, the stepfather crack was a joke. I'm in my 30's. My stepfather is fond of "knowing stuff", though. He's a republican.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Muthu Ramadoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its all speculation and guesses. No one knows except for Google. And we all > must trust Google will do the right thing in the end. > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:54 PM, arnouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I read on different thread here : > > - judges read the first page of our manual > > - can look the video that we sent (I don't attach video, it was too > > big..and well...) > > - if judge is interesting by the doc, he could launch the application > > to look the UI, but not really for testing > > - I had a connexion on my web server from California (OK it could be > > good) > > - but nobody has subscribed on the website to test the application > > (synchronization between application and web server) > > > > I've no proof that my app is out, but sincerely...I'm not anymore > > enthousiasm ! do you have a proof that I'm or not in 100 !! :) > > > > Regards, > > Arnaud > > > > > > On May 1, 4:18 pm, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > arnouf, > > > > > > Where did you get this idea, that the judges are not testing your > > > application in a fair way? Do you have any concrete proof that your > > > application was wasted? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:33 PM, arnouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > So If I understand well. 100 applications have been selected without > > > > to be tested!! > > > > Wow...So, If I no connection on my server before monday, I think that > > > > my apps is already out! > > > > > > > I thought that to test application we must read documentation, test > > > > application... > > > > > > > 5 months to develop a server and an Android application without to be > > > > tested...It's a little bit hard to understand! > > > > > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > On May 1, 2:27 pm, "Kevin Galligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 10 minutes. But you have to read docs. Then you test. Then scores. > > > > > Then I'd bet you have to write something about the app. Then you get > > > > > an email from your buddy about something... > > > > > > > > 10 minutes is not a lot of time. > > > > > > > > Now, Muthu. you may be right. But why are you insisting you are with > > > > > no real info? You're like my stepfather. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Muthu Ramadoss > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Agree, it would be like 10 mins. 30 mins is just too long to > evaluate > > > > any > > > > > > application. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So assuming that each judge spends a minimum of 30 minutes > judging > > > > an > > > > > > > > application > > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking more like 10 mins...perhaps maybe a couple more > between > > > > > > > applications to wipe data and do a fresh install... > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 11:56 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, this is why I think that they will not make the May 5th > > > > deadline. > > > > > > > > Dan M. said that there are around 100 judges, also, he > mentioned > > > > that > > > > > > > > each judge had about 76 applications. Now, if there are 1788 > > > > > > > > applications and each application has four judges then that > means > > > > that > > > > > > > > there are effectively 1788*4=7152 entries to judge. > > > > > > > > You hear that, they are judgin 7152 applications. Since there > are > > > > > > > > only 100 judges then each judge gets 7152/100=72 applications. > > > > Which > > > > > > > > is very close to the 76 applications. > > > > > > > > > > > So assuming that each judge spends a minimum of 30 minutes > judging > > > > an > > > > > > > > application he will need (76*30)/60= 38 hours to judge all of > > > > them. > > > > > > > > But judges are not machines, so between their real work, > > > > distractions, > > > > > > > > and having to stop and go with every new application I would > > > > double > > > > > > > > this time which is still very agreesive. So they need 76 hours > > > > each to > > > > > > > > judge the applications. That is almost two weeks of full time > > > > work. > > > > > > > > Unless we assume that they are doing nothing else I think it > is a > > > > bit > > > > > > > > of a strech to say that they will finish on time. > > > > > > > > > > > On May 1, 2:34 am, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The judging has reached the final stage. The top 100 had > been > > > > filtered > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > of 1788 apps. The judges are busy now selecting the final 50 > > > > winners > > > > > > out of > > > > > > > > > the top 100. > > > > > > > > > > > > Good luck droids! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Incognito < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > So Dan (or anybody at google), > > > > > > > > > > > > > How far are you guys into the judging? The suspense is > killing > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > take care, > > > > > > > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > > > > > > >http://mobeegal.in > > > > > > > > > > > > find stuff closer.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > take care, > > > > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > > > >http://mobeegal.in > > > > > > find stuff closer. > > > > > > -- > > > take care, > > > Muthu Ramadoss. > > > > > > http://mobeegal.in > > > find stuff closer. > > > > > > > > -- > take care, > Muthu Ramadoss. > > http://mobeegal.in > find stuff closer. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
