Guys. The point here is that the apps aren't even opened. That's the heart of the issue. Even the worst of fan-boy comp-sci 101 apps should be opened, just to make the guy feel good. You don't have to spend 30 minutes on it, true, but look at the thing.
The music analogy is awful, by the way. Dude, you watch too many movies. On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Hielko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I certainly agree with you that judges don't need a lot of time to > figure out if they like your application. If I see an application > posted here I almost always know enough when reading the description, > and certainly after viewing a few minutes of screencast. I'm not a > judge and I don't have to think about how many points I have to give, > but i suppose that the majority of the apps are almost immediately > rejected. > > > > On 3 mei, 01:05, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more thing, in the music business producers will only need to hear > > a person for a minute or less to determine whether they like the > > person or not. Same is the thing here. They do not need to spend half > > an hour testing your application to determine whether they like it or > > not. So if you only got a minute or so,well, I'm sorry to tell you > > this but it could be that: > > > > A) Your application stinks from the judges perspective and no matter > > how much you want them to look at it the longer they look at it the > > stronger the stench. > > B)Your application had a problem and failed to load or work as you > > expected, this would not be unusual given that these are all first > > versions and have not been thoroughly tested, even if you claim you > > did. Things always fail when somebody other than you tests the > > application. Belive me, I have several years of experience and this is > > very true. > > C)The judge got confused on how to use your application (I'm being > > nice here so that you can blame it on the judge, of course it is not > > your application, it is perfect, a work of art, and this is the only > > reason you did not win!) > > > > On May 2, 5:25 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Fourth, we need an escalation process if we can prove that our > > > > application was not evaluated fairly. We are dealing with globally- > > > > written apps being globally evaluated – at a minimum, there are bound > > > > to some language and cultural miscommunications. > > > > > What are you? Insane? This will never happen. Seems to me like you > > > rather work the angles rather than win the competition like everybody > > > else.- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - > > > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
