Good points. I'll amend my 100% support. I glossed over the "started by developers" bit. That's obviously not true.
I'm a little on the fence about the whole escalation thing. I'm sure there won't be anything like that, but I understand why people would want it. Transparency of the process would help a lot with that. The idea is that if you get 4 reviews, its a lot less likely that you'll just have "bad luck" with your scores. If your scores are bad its because your app is bad. However, at the root of this issue is that it doesn't appear to us scouring our logs that we've had 4 reviews. So what percent is my support? Its Friday. I'm beat. No more math. 80%-ish. I guess. On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fourth, we need an escalation process if we can prove that our > > application was not evaluated fairly. We are dealing with globally- > > written apps being globally evaluated – at a minimum, there are bound > > to some language and cultural miscommunications. > > What are you? Insane? This will never happen. Seems to me like you > rather work the angles rather than win the competition like everybody > else. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
