LOL.. I think you copied their secret criteria. I was thinking it was based on the app with the least complex math, but I can see now that you came across their secret docs.
If they had only let that out before I might of won. > - Simplicity (least taxing concept on the judges) > - Least innovative (Funtionality must be available on existing phones) > - Must have a screen with Google Maps/LBS (I wonder if the judges knew > that the ability to send notifications is also a powerful Android > feature). > - Most impressive looking (attractive pictures) > - And ofcourse, no games please ! We need basic apps on top of our > stack first. On May 13, 5:29 pm, gtandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the criteria should have been as follows > > - Simplicity (least taxing concept on the judges) > - Least innovative (Funtionality must be available on existing phones) > - Must have a screen with Google Maps/LBS (I wonder if the judges knew > that the ability to send notifications is also a powerful Android > feature). > - Most impressive looking (attractive pictures) > - And ofcourse, no games please ! We need basic apps on top of our > stack first. > > On May 13, 5:17 pm, sebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Even if I lose, I'm glad to see that Phonebook 2.0 won with quite the > > same idea I had. Except that it was a company full of resources and > > able to deliver a more polished product than mine, BTW my app have a > > cooler name : Full Contact. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
