Thinking about this more I suppose I'll issue Verizon-only releases, and solicit the input from users to find out if and how 2.0 on Moto breaks the apps. Geez we're getting pushed into pretty shitty practices here, or perhaps that's the acceptable standard now.
On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, momo <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't agree more. Release beta SDKs for each of your releases for > developers or any developers who already has an application in the > Market. As changes are being implemented, update the beta SDKs to new > versions. This way developers are GIVEN MORE TIME to verify that > their apps work. > > Sigh sometimes I feel the Android team is run very poorly. > > On Oct 26, 4:22 pm, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If this is true... insulting to those that conduct open source > > development truly open source. > > > Makes me consider to change the licensing of the stuffs I've released > > on Apache 2.0 back to GPL. > > > On Oct 26, 2:30 pm, wimbet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If Google likes your app, you can get early access to the Android 2.0 > > > code. > > > >http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/google-hand-picks-developers-for... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
