Why was I thinking the contacts provider was different and
standard? :)

- Juan T.

On Aug 28, 2:03 am, hackbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah too late for 1.0. :}  But you know, there is no reason someone
> else couldn't write such a thing -- the contacts provider itself is
> just an app and there is nothing special about it, so a virtual
> contacts provider doesn't need any special platform support either.
>
> On Aug 27, 3:29 pm, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > p.s. I guess if there's time at this late date.
> > If not, then maybe the next version of Android since it's such a big
> > thing.
>
> > - Juan T.
>
> > On Aug 27, 5:20 pm, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, that's the point, not to mix them. So two different contact
> > > providers separates the two different types of contacts.
>
> > > If the other type of contact provider (not for personal contacts)
> > > called the Virtual Contacts Content Provider isn't provided, then
> > > developers have to make their own content provider for the users
> > > virtual (social space contacts, etc.) contacts that are part of their
> > > app. So it's either each app builds their own "virtual contacts"
> > > Content Provider -or- there is a standard Content Provider for these
> > > virtual contacts. So that's what I'm saying.
>
> > > On Aug 27, 4:43 pm, hackbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 27, 1:26 pm, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Also to mention that there should be big differences. Such as that
> > > > > Virtual Contacts don't have a phone number.
>
> > > > It sounds to me like you are talking about a different kind of content
> > > > provider, not the normal contacts provider.
>
> > > > > You may press a button to
> > > > > put a virtual contact in your Personal Contacts though. Anyway, I
> > > > > think this is very important. This was an issue with the GTalkService
> > > > > problem I believe. But hopefully this will be in 1.0 because so many
> > > > > apps will use Virtual Contacts and not just Personal Contacts.
>
> > > > No, there will be nothing like this in 1.0.  As you've see, one of the
> > > > reasons why the GTalk data API was removed was because of the concern
> > > > of mixing these two kinds of people.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Announcing the new Android 0.9 SDK beta!
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/08/announcing-beta-release-of-android-sdk.html
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to