You or I could correct many things in the documentation just given one day. So it's not a herculean effort. ..My point is that the SDK is useless without the documentation. Right now the docs are in beta. Android is a challenge as is. It wouldn't be just nice to have good docs, it's essential. ..And having that sentence on the front doesn't elicit an incredible trust in android as a whole. ..I'm on Android's side but I feel I have to make a comment on these things.
- Juan T. On Sep 27, 10:18 am, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes and Absolutely. The SDK is inseparable to the Documentation. > Otherwise the SDK is only for those who are the top something percent > who can get into the code, etc. When I look at a class, I would like > to be pretty sure that class exists within 1.0 and I'm not looking at > an illusion. There's the release notes, etc. But I have to have the > release notes, etc on one tab and the classes on another? > > - Juan T. > > On Sep 27, 9:59 am, Mark Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > jtaylor wrote: > > > My suggestion is that in an update to the SDK, everything should be > > > updated at the same exact time. > > > Are you willing to have the SDK be delayed to accomplish that goal? > > > I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice. But I have to assume that the > > Android team is strapped for time for the G1 rollout, and documentation > > is an easy and common thing to let slide a bit. It's been done before. > > > -- > > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com > > Warescription: All titles, revisions, & ebook formats, just $35/year --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
