On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Phil <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, what I am doing is first and foremost for my own benefit and not > a financial one...
Yay! > I gather that this approach might > be used to provide tethering on 2.2 devices that don't have the > capability enabled by the carrier. That's a possibility, though I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the defenses are more than the skin-deep act of @hide. > Personally I'd rather Google bundle a widget if they're not yet > willing to make the API public. I find myself frequently needing to > turn the AP on for a few minutes before turning it off again on client > premises. Gingerbread may shuffle the deck on both the API and the app widget fronts. I agree that having AP access in the power widget or something would be handy. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android App Developer Books: http://commonsware.com/books -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
