The risk you complain about is real, but it was a legitimate question: I had serious doubts about what you meant by 'legs', too. I am sure there are many others who have no idea what you were trying to say.
On May 24, 10:54 am, DanH <[email protected]> wrote: > I figured you would, and I'm not interested in getting into a p***ing > match, so I'm not going to elaborate. > > On May 24, 11:09 am, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:29 AM, DanH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Additionally, Android, as it's currently designed, does not have > > > "legs". The process model and UI are both too restrictive to be > > > extendable to the pads and other new paradigms of the future. > > > Care to explain that? I very much disagree. > > > -- > > Dianne Hackborn > > Android framework engineer > > [email protected] > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and > > answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
