On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:03:45AM +0530, Appaholics wrote:
> I was looking to do more with the Android camera. Personally I have nothing
> against the formats that are currently supported, except that a good
> photographer (which I am not) would be able to get a much better image if
> all the camera data is kept in a raw format for post processing.

Time to inject a couple of important points....  First, the "raw" image
format you're referring to is a TIFF image.  It's the highest resolution
format that is in common use.

HOWEVER, the digital cameras that I've seen on Android devices have all
been in the 2 to 3 MP range.  That stinks.  That REALLY stinks.  As an
amateur photographer, myself, with some training by a pro, I wouldn't
bother with a TIFF from any digital camera in that range.  It's just
not worth it.  A PNG is fine.  TIFFs come into play on the high
resolution side...not with extremely low resolutions.  And it's not
just about the resolution; you also have to look at the glass;  a
poor-quality lens will produce a terrible image even at the highest
resolution.  Likewise, a low resolution digital's image will just end
up being pixelated if you expand it beyond a certain size (size limited
by resolution).

If you want to do serious photography, you won't be using a low-res
digital.  (You might not be using a digital camera at all---there is
still no substitute for film in some areas of photography.)

Low resolution digitals have their place; it's the same place that
the old Instamatic or Polaroid cameras had:  memory pictures.  People
taking these tend not to care (or even know) about TIFFs.

High resolution digital imagery has its places too.  More serious
photography (where digital fits) is one.  I used to work with another
area, as well...but since I was read out of that program years ago....

Later,
   --jim

-- 
73 DE N5IAL (/4)        | DMR: So fsck was originally called
[email protected]    |      something else.
< Running FreeBSD 7.0 > | Q:   What was it called?
ICBM / Hurricane:       | DMR: Well, the second letter was different.
   30.44406N 86.59909W  |    -- Dennis M. Ritchie, Usenix, June 1998.

Android Apps Listing at http://www.jstrack.org/barcodes.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to