@Dianne, You are right, i think part of the reason why the demand for the ability to release paid apps is high so early on is the fantastic job that has been done on the SDK, the platform that was picked for the programmability and in general the confidence developers (even at the time of release) have on the platform that they will be able to stand behind the apps they build. A lot of this is testament to the trust that we as developers place on the platform. So all this clamoring should be taken as a compliment :-) -Nitro
On Dec 30 2008, 5:29 pm, "Justin Collum" <[email protected]> wrote: > I heard somewhere that there was a 90 day moratorium on not-free apps. Looks > like I heard wrong. > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Just to be clear, this is lots of speculation and no facts. :) Some facts > > I can share: Android is stable as of 1.0 and we will not be breaking > > compatibility, and in particular we will not be breaking applications in the > > cupcake branch. > > > Comparing Android to iPhone in that way is also a questionable endeavor, > > since the way they were released was very different: iPhone shipped for > > almost a year with no support for third party apps and then released an > > update to add that feature, while Android shipped from the start with third > > party app support. I can't comment on adoption of the G1 vs. the original > > iPhone, but clearly at this point there is a smaller number of Android > > users, simply because we started from 0 at the point where third party > > developers were supported. This is something developers should keep in mind > > and certainly isn't being hidden. > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Sven Boden <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I think the answer is guessable (and no I don't work for Google)... when > >> the android OS settles down more or less. I expect it a little while after > >> the "cupcake" release. Currently some things are still going to break and > >> if > >> they would allow you to buy applications from the market, you would need to > >> get a new version of the applications very quickly, ... > > >> I also don't think android adoption is as quick as the iphone's. In a lot > >> of countries you can't even get an T1 in a "legal/normal way"... Belgium > >> e.g. :( . So maybe if applications would come out now as paying > >> applications > >> they would disappoint the developers as well qua sales. > > >> Regards, > >> Sven > > >> 2008/12/29 NitroDesk <[email protected]> > > >>> True, but the most distressing part is the inability to distribute > >>> paid apps on the market, even with the possibility of charging for > >>> them offsite. > >>> I bet this keeps lots of good apps from showing up on the market, and > >>> worse still, from being developed. > >>> -Nitro > > >>> On Dec 28, 12:48 pm, "Sven Boden" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > There are already sites out there which allow you to charge for android > >>> > apps, for the "official" site I didn't see anything out there yet. > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Sven > > >>> > 2008/12/28 Redhunt <[email protected]> > > >>> > > Has anyone heard any news on when developers will be able to post > >>> apps > >>> > > for a fee ? > > >>> > > Thanks- Hide quoted text - > > >>> > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > Dianne Hackborn > > Android framework engineer > > [email protected] > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > > forums, where I and others can see and answer them.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
