I agree with Nikolay. The paid section is certainly less frequented than the free section and unlocker apps are confusing. You'll have people complaining that they paid for an app but didn't get any because they don't realize they'd have to download the "free" app too. Why not just have a paid, full version of your app additionally to the free app which can be upgraded through in-app billing? If you want more discoveries add a live wallpaper or a home screen widget to your app -> the app will be listed in the according categories as well ;-).
On Dec 6, 7:53 am, androidmediadeveloper <[email protected]> wrote: > we're also using inapp billing, and it does work. however, the app is > listed only on the "free" section of the market. we want it listed > under "paid" as well, more discovery. Are there easier ways to do this > than using an unlocker ? > > On Dec 5, 8:29 pm, Emanuel Moecklin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Why not use in-appbilling to unlock the features in yourfreeapp? > > That way user's don't have to install a secondappthat does nothing > > but unlock features in anotherapp. > > I'm doing this in my own apps and it works nicely. > > > Emanuel Moecklin > > 1gravity LLC > > > On Dec 5, 9:54 am, androidmediadeveloper <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > I have aFreeappwith pro features "locked". I also have a paidapp > > > that is basically a stub, an "unlocker". My question is this, can I > > > run theLVLcheckto see if user has purchased the unlocker/stubapp > > > from inside of myfreeapp? It'd be great if this were possible, but > > > from my experiments until now, isnt the case. > > > > Any advice ? thoughts ? > > > > Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
