2) is definitely true. I really wish in-app purchases of managed items were shown in the Market app, just like existing purchases of paid apps are, even if those app are not installed.
6 декабря 2011 г. 21:21 пользователь Kevin TeslaCoil Software <[email protected]> написал: > Recently there was a discussion on reddit.com/r/Android about a new > app being unlocked by in-app-purchase. Users were wishing for an > unlock key app or pro version. IIRC their reasons were: > 1) Permissions could be less on a pro version (no ads) > 2) Fear/uncertainty about if the license would carry over between apps > on in-app-billing. Since in-app-purchases are implemented differently > by different devs, it's inconsistent. > > Might be able to get around (2) if it's clearly explained, but it's > understandable how users might associate in-app-purchase with > temporarily items from games or whatever, compared to app-purchases > which are clearly permanent. > > On Dec 6, 8:41 am, Emanuel Moecklin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree with Nikolay. >> The paid section is certainly less frequented than the free section >> and unlocker apps are confusing. You'll have people complaining that >> they paid for an app but didn't get any because they don't realize >> they'd have to download the "free" app too. >> Why not just have a paid, full version of your app additionally to the >> free app which can be upgraded through in-app billing? >> If you want more discoveries add a live wallpaper or a home screen >> widget to your app -> the app will be listed in the according >> categories as well ;-). >> >> On Dec 6, 7:53 am, androidmediadeveloper <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > we're also using inapp billing, and it does work. however, the app is >> > listed only on the "free" section of the market. we want it listed >> > under "paid" as well, more discovery. Are there easier ways to do this >> > than using an unlocker ? >> >> > On Dec 5, 8:29 pm, Emanuel Moecklin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > Why not use in-appbilling to unlock the features in yourfreeapp? >> > > That way user's don't have to install a secondappthat does nothing >> > > but unlock features in anotherapp. >> > > I'm doing this in my own apps and it works nicely. >> >> > > Emanuel Moecklin >> > > 1gravity LLC >> >> > > On Dec 5, 9:54 am, androidmediadeveloper <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > > I have aFreeappwith pro features "locked". I also have a paidapp >> > > > that is basically a stub, an "unlocker". My question is this, can I >> > > > run theLVLcheckto see if user has purchased the unlocker/stubapp >> > > > from inside of myfreeapp? It'd be great if this were possible, but >> > > > from my experiments until now, isnt the case. >> >> > > > Any advice ? thoughts ? >> >> > > > Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
