On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michael Banzon <mich...@banzon.dk> wrote:
> I am sure that Ralph will be absolutely ecstatic about that - can you
> imagine that - a working example that require less code/library
> inclusion compared to my app - absolutely magnificent!
I didn't post the example, but I have to agree. It is indeed a lot
better, than having to include (or write your own) Base64
implementation just to re-invent a feature that is already
available and probably well tested. Magnificent indeed :)
>
> Personally the first part ("working") would be my clear focus.
>
working != good
working != maintainable
etc.
> Have a nice day ;-)
>
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
