On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Latimerius <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Kristopher Micinski > <[email protected]> wrote: >> True, but I don't consider "games" (which typically use one activity >> and don't really use the pices of the framework) to be apps. Maybe >> people disagree, I'd call them games. > > Game is a kind of application if you ask me but that's not as > important. The characteristics I described can apply not only to > games - anything with little platform interaction (UI or otherwise) > and computationally intensive core could be a good candidate for NDK. > Like, say, a scientific application (astronomy, biochemistry?) with a > demanding 3D visualisation and some expensive computations inside - > perhaps not a perfect example but I hope you get the point. >
No I understand, it's just that I think most apps are not that :-)... kris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
