andjarnic wrote: > Kris, I was referring to Lew's response. Text is of course impossible to > know someone's tone, some people may just reply with what seems like > "ruffled feathers" answers..but might just be making a point instead. > Regardless, I don't let responses bother me for the most part, but it > seemed as if my response about android devices not getting too hot and such > ruffled Lew's feathers a little given his two responses. >
So disagreement with a factual assertion on the basis of facts constitutes "ruffled feathers"? I'm not sure that word means what you think it means. Or is that your way of deflecting an argument for which you have no logical or evidentiary response? I entered this discussion thinking that facts and logic were the rule of the day. Now you are getting personal and weird. Bye-bye. Yes, *now* my feathers are ruffled. I'm so disappointed that you are unwilling to engage in reasoned discussion. -- Lew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
