On Feb 25, 1:51 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that ADP1 makes a better development device (it's easier to > pretend that you have no keyboard even if you have one than the other
Developers may be attracted to the G2 for other reasons too - e.g. a phone that can be used for demonstrations to investors and customers. Given the amount of cross-border activity within Europe (it is only a 2 hour train ride from London to Paris, more than 20 countries can be reached within 1-3 hours flying), the network locked G1 and G2 would be really expensive to operate, particularly for data. Someone doing product marketing (e.g. demonstrating a corporate app running on Android) across different countries would probably want the dev phone and a SIM card for each country they visit. > way around), and supporting a single development device has already > proven to be hard enough that adding a second one would stretch our > meager resources even thinner. What is the real challenge in supporting the development devices? How much support is the manufacturer able to provide, particularly with hardware issues? Surely a developer isn't going to be hassling Google or HTC with simple questions like `what is a SIM card?' --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
