> 5) We still don't have .33 for our phones. I can't mark something as > Spam yet nor even see what's for sale on Market. This should have been > ready when it rolled to users. Or at least tell us WHEN it will be > ready. This 'coming soon' stuff doesn't do much fo rme.
How about now: http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/03/software-update-available-for-android.html Cheers, Justin Android Team @ Google On Mar 10, 10:34 am, Inderjeet Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > In democratic systems, even the dumb shills should have a voice. They at > least downloaded your app, or (for paid applications) bought and may be > refunded it. > I agree if there was a bad rating because of market problems (couldn't > download, or copy-protection issue), it is worth taking down. But that is > probably hard to do in an automated manner. Moreover, if enough people mark > it as spam, it will probably get excluded. May be all the developers on this > list should commit to doing so if they see such a comment on any app. > > Inder > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On "dumb shills": When everyone else is giving your app 5 stars, and > > one idiot gives it one star and leaves a comments proving she never > > even ran the program, that's one clue. Outliers should automatically > > be treated as spam. > > > Thanks for your answers. Nice to hear any feedback from anyone. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
