I too think this change is a bad idea and will decrease the user's
experience with my application.

I am surprised that Android's security model asking for permissions
when every application is installed is tollerated while WIndows Vista
basically doing the same thing in a simpler way receives howls of
protest.

Additionally, I don't think the average teenager or grand-mother knows
what any of the fine grain permissions in Android mean and will just
go ahead and allow any app to have the permissions it wants.  Being
somewhat knowledgable, I wonder if the app is using the permission for
the stated purpose or does it do more than it says.



On Apr 24, 7:19 am, chrispix <[email protected]> wrote:
> While I read the blog here 
> :http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/04/future-proofing-your-a...
> I almost had a heart attack. Having a location based application, the
> number one issue we had was being able to automatically turn on / off
> GPS based on an application setting. Which quite frankly makes some
> sense.
>
> Having to prompt the user each time to turn on / off gps is a giant
> pain from the standpoint of program flow.
>
> I have used our applications setting to actually turn GPS off, because
> it was faster to open our app and close the app, and turn off GPS.
> Rather than opening the settings, and doing it that way.
>
> I hope you have updated the market so we can respond to all the
> negative feedback regarding having to manually enable GPS/disable
> GPS.
>
> The coding change is not the matter. The fact that a useful function
> was taken away. Can't there be some way to code GPS state to an
> application state?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to