Doh! Apparently LayoutInflater lets you inflate abstract classes. I'll fixed CheckedTextView to not be abstract anymore. Sorry for that.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Romain Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > CheckedTextView has always been abstract. You cannot and could not > instantiate it from code but you can use it from XML yes. This has not > changed from 1.1 to 1.5. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:10 AM, nEx.Software > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I was able to include it in my XML Layout file in 1.1. So to continue >> using it, I'll have to extend it? And reimplement the functions that >> were already provided to me in the last SDK? It is incredibly >> frustrating when, per instructions from the Android engineers, I >> followed what was in the SDK and now it no longer works. Thanks for >> the info, guess I'll Just extend it and go from there. >> >> On Apr 29, 10:57 am, Romain Guy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> CheckedTextView is an abstract class, just as it was in Android 1.1. >>> This means you cannot instantiate it directly. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:52 AM, nEx.Software >>> >>> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > So I tried to test CheckedTextView in a new project based on 1.5 and >>> > it doesn't even show as an option. tried to create in code via >>> > CheckedTextView CTV = new CheckedTextView(this); but it cannot be >>> > instantiated, so how do we use CheckedTextView in the new SDK? What >>> > gives? >>> >>> > On Apr 28, 7:15 pm, "nEx.Software" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Seems 1.5 has changed CheckedTextView where the android:checkmark xml >>> >> no longer works? Also, the documentation appears to say indicate the >>> >> checkmarkdrawable only is drawn when checked but does this mean there >>> >> is no uncheckeddrawable?I'm not able to check in my project at the >>> >> moment but it certainly seems this is the case. My UI broke, I know >>> >> that much. Any thoughts? >>> >>> -- >>> Romain Guy >>> Android framework engineer >>> [email protected] >>> >>> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time >>> to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on >>> public forums, where I and others can see and answer them >> >> >> > > > > -- > Romain Guy > Android framework engineer > [email protected] > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time > to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on > public forums, where I and others can see and answer them > -- Romain Guy Android framework engineer [email protected] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
