Whether on or off topic, I don't know, but my approach has been to
keep a lite/demo version and pro version of my app.  This requires
more effort on my part, but it seems like the best solution.  I've
been chided for calling my lite version "lite" instead of "demo", but
that is a matter of perspective.  One person's interpretation as demo
might be another's lite because it suits their limited needs.  Users
are so rude in their comments, I just can't get over how horrible some
people can be.

On May 14, 5:31 am, Mariano Kamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM, mirko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you are interested in a pro license you can have a
> > look at
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/threa...
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> > P.S. Great little app your NewsRob, I loaded it 2 months ago ;-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Besides the monetary benefits or the lack thereof I learned a lot during the
> development. I also now have an app that does exactly what I think a Google
> Reader client should do - and what I've never found on any other platform.
> No matter how cool Palm's pre or the iPhone 3.0/4G will be, I am staying
> with Android as a user, until somebody brings out a better app for this
> purpose on another platform.
>
> So even though my comments from above (about the Android Market and its
> rollout) may sound like I am bitter, I am not.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to