You're a genius! I pretty much did exactly what you said and it works perfectly now!
BTW, I will be getting at least your Advanced Dev book, if not the Tutorials book as well! On Jul 8, 2:03 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael J wrote: > > So I'm using a modified version of the SectionedAdapter and it seems > > to be working quite well. The only issue is that I want to let each > > "section" adapter to determine the clickability of it's items. It > > seems like with the SectionedAdapter, all items except the headers are > > clickable. How exactly would I modify SectionedAdapter.isEnabled() to > > use the corresponding section's isEnabled()? > > Off the cuff, I'd try: > > Step #1: Modify the Section inner class of SectionedAdapter to hold an > isEnabled boolean, with an appropriate constructor parameter > > Step #2: Modify SectionedAdapter#addSection() to take an isEnabled > boolean and pass it to the Section constructor > > Step #3: Modify SectionedAdapter#isEnabled() to do a logical AND between > the current logic (getItemViewType(position)!=TYPE_SECTION_HEADER) and > the Section's isEnabled flag, for whatever Section corresponds to the > supplied position > > > I've spent time looking > > at the methods used for getItem(), getViewType(), and getView() which > > seem to do similar things, but honestly don't quite understand what's > > being done... > > Well, um, it's, er, explained in the book. :-) And if you've read the > chapter and still don't understand, then I need to do a better job on > that chapter. > > Upshot: SectionedAdapter implements a variant of the Aggregator pattern. > It implements the Adapter methods in such a way that the Section for a > given position determines what happens (e.g., what View goes with a > given position). Right now, isEnabled() only needs to worry about > whether or not the position corresponds to a heading -- in what you want > to do, you need to also see what the Section thinks. > > Also, bear in mind that it *is* just a book example, designed to > demonstrate a technique (in concert with the book itself). Use of this > code in a nuclear power plant or heart monitor -- let alone a > nuclear-powered heart monitor -- is not recommended... ;-) > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Android App Developer Training:http://commonsware.com/training.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
