OBE = overcome by events... Meant to say that the release of 2.0 has made some of the discussion irrelevant.
On Oct 27, 10:06 am, Disconnect <[email protected]> wrote: > OBE? > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:03 PM, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, this is one: > >http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.0.html#api > > is OBE. > > > After review of the documented changes to 2.0, I know already my 1.6- > > based releases will break. Verizon's off the list now to buy some > > time... > > > On Oct 27, 5:19 am, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are right of course, that was meant to include a kill switch to > >> float temporarily for some intelligence gathering. > > >> On Oct 27, 2:12 am, MrChaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > That's a slippy slope to start on JP, not long until we're building > >> > for vendor specific custom OS's and then versions of those OS's. > >> > Say what you will about Apple but having a super tight target platform > >> > makes everyones life so much easier. Heck, just look at the dominance > >> > of consoles. > > >> > roll on > >> > SenseUI build > >> > MotoBlur build > >> > Vanilla build > > >> > On Oct 26, 11:54 pm, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > Thinking about this more I suppose I'll issue Verizon-only releases, > >> > > and solicit the input from users to find out if and how 2.0 on Moto > >> > > breaks the apps. > >> > > Geez we're getting pushed into pretty shitty practices here, or > >> > > perhaps that's the acceptable standard now. > > >> > > On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, momo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > I can't agree more. Release beta SDKs for each of your releases for > >> > > > developers or any developers who already has an application in the > >> > > > Market. As changes are being implemented, update the beta SDKs to > >> > > > new > >> > > > versions. This way developers are GIVEN MORE TIME to verify that > >> > > > their apps work. > > >> > > > Sigh sometimes I feel the Android team is run very poorly. > > >> > > > On Oct 26, 4:22 pm, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > If this is true... insulting to those that conduct open source > >> > > > > development truly open source. > > >> > > > > Makes me consider to change the licensing of the stuffs I've > >> > > > > released > >> > > > > on Apache 2.0 back to GPL. > > >> > > > > On Oct 26, 2:30 pm, wimbet <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > > If Google likes your app, you can get early access to the > >> > > > > > Android 2.0 > >> > > > > > code. > > >> > > > > >http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/google-hand-picks-developers-for... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
