Dammit yeah that would be broken.  I'll make sure this is fixed in the next
version; for now i guess you will need to include both -v4 and -v5
resources.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Artem <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Trying to help by digging up the code.
>
> I found this:
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en&sa=N&cd=1&ct=rc#uX1GffpyOZk/include/utils/ResourceTypes.h&q=ResTable_config&l=787
>
>    // Return true if 'this' can be considered a match for the
> parameters in
>    // 'settings'.
>    // Note this is asymetric.  A default piece of data will match
> every request
>    // but a request for the default should not match odd specifics
>    // (ie, request with no mcc should not match a particular mcc's
> data)
>    // settings is the requested settings
>    inline bool match(const ResTable_config& settings) const {
> ...
>
>        if (version != 0) {
>            if (settings.sdkVersion != 0 && sdkVersion != 0
>                && sdkVersion != settings.sdkVersion) {
>                return false;
>            }
>            if (settings.minorVersion != 0 && minorVersion != 0
>                && minorVersion != settings.minorVersion) {
>                return false;
>            }
>        }
>        return true;
>   }
>
> Of course I am not sure where this is used, but I only see an != here.
> Hopefully, this is not the right code. Or perhaps there is new code in
> Eclair that is not available yet, that makes this better.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Artem
>
> On Oct 29, 9:12 pm, Artem Petakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dianne, I am sorry to say it also does not work for me. Actually, we had
> > made a mistake and originally forgot the v4, which screwed up Cupcake,
> but
> > now we added the v4 (and make no other changes), and it stopped working.
> >
> > Am I missing something? Or is there perhaps a serious problem? Please
> reply
> > back so we can take action -- we need to publish a new APK for the
> Cupcake
> > users, but we can't figure out how to do that without breaking Eclair.
> >
> > Artem
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM, webmonkey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dianne,
> >
> > > The v flag does indeed not work, I am using the Android 2.0 SDK with
> > > the following AndroidManifest settings:
> >
> > > <uses-sdk
> > >    android:minSdkVersion="3"
> > >     android:targetSdkVersion="5"
> > > />
> >
> > > Running on a WVGA854 emulator with density 240 and API 5, I get the
> > > following results:
> >
> > > drawable-hdpi-v4
> >
> > > is ignored
> >
> > > drawable-hdpi-v5
> >
> > > is ignored, very strange
> >
> > > drawable-hdpi
> >
> > > works, but we can't use that
> >
> > > On Oct 29, 3:45 pm, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I am pretty positive it works.  Nothing changed in 2.0 -- this has
> been
> > > the
> > > > same since 1.0, if the platform's SDK version is < the resource
> version,
> > > > then the resource is ignored.
> >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Looks like -v4 flag doesn't work in Android 2.0. Any ideas?
> >
> > > > > On Oct 22, 8:38 am, Nikolay Ananiev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > This is how I made my app resolution-independent and with Android
> 1.5
> > > > > legacy
> > > > > > support:
> >
> > > > > > Why did I put my high-dpi images in the drawable-hdpi-v4 folder
> and
> > > not
> > > > > in
> > > > > > drawable-hdpi? Because the Android 1.5 OS can't handle the -hdpi
> and
> > > > > tries
> > > > > > to use these images instead of the ones in the res/drawable
> folder.
> > > The
> > > > > -v4
> > > > > > flag is only meaningful for Android 1.6 and works perfect.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > > Android framework engineer
> > > > [email protected]
> >
> > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time
> to
> > > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All
> such
> > > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can
> see
> > > and
> > > > answer them.
> >
>


-- 
Dianne Hackborn
Android framework engineer
[email protected]

Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
answer them.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to