Thanks for the clarification Dianne.

Is it also OK to use my solution with the normal 1.5 resolution
bitmaps in drawable-mdpi and the high resolution bitmaps in drawable-
hdpi. For some reason the 1.5 emulator correctly gets the bitmaps from
the drawable-mdpi folder if you don't use drawable-ldpi. It seems to
work fine.

On Nov 2, 8:39 pm, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes there are bugs in the version matching.  I just submitted a fix that
> should go into the first OTA update for Droid; the current 2.0 should only
> ever ship on Droid, and be replaced with an update at that point, so
> hopefully this will not be a long-term problem.
>
> In the meantime, the work-around is to have the resources as both -v4 and
> -v6.  I know that is a pain; I am very sorry.  (For those curious, there are
> two problems: first when the version matching was implemented, this was a
> late addition to 1.0 "just in case," and was implemented as a simple
> comparison because the semantics hadn't yet been defined.  Now when we are
> actually using it, we've discovered the code never code fully implemented
> with the correct semantics.  On top of that, there was a change done late in
> 2.0 so that "development builds" would match the next version number for
> resources, which I messed up and thus broke the final release versioning.)
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Artem Petakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Right, you have to use -v4 for that of course. It's similar to what Dianne
> > had suggested above (using both -v4 and -v5), except v5 is actually v6. It
> > just seems that somewhere deep in this part of the Eclair code there is
> > something that makes it think that the sdkVersion is 6, not 5. Dianne, could
> > you please comment since this is the only workaround that works so far?
>
> > I would love to find this out myself, but since the Eclair code is not yet
> > available, it's hard to figure this out. I'm assuming the code drop is
> > coming soon.
>
> > I have verified that by using both -v4 and -v6, I can get things to work on
> > every platform.
>
> > For those interested, to avoid duplicating actual pngs/jpgs, I am using an
> > ugly hack. Here is an example
>
> > Folder drawable-160dpi:
> > example_image.png (the mdpi version of image)
>
> > Folder drawable-240dpi-v4:
> > XML file "example_image.xml" with the following inside:
> > <bitmap xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"; 
> > android:src="@drawable/example_image_hdpi"
> > />
>
> > Folder drawable-240dpi-v6:
> > Same "example_image.xml" with the following inside:
> > <bitmap xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"; 
> > android:src="@drawable/example_image_hdpi"
> > />
>
> > Folder drawable-nodpi:
> > example_image_hdpi.png (the hdpi version of image)
>
> > Yes, it's very ugly. Any better ideas are very welcome.
>
> > Artem
>
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:36 PM, webmonkey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> drawable-hdpi-v6 does indeed work in the 2.0 emulator but not in a 1.6
> >> emulator. And because it is not exactly clear what the problem is I do
> >> not recommend using it.
>
> >> I am still hoping to find a solution where I can just use drawable-
> >> hdpi
>
> >> On Oct 30, 8:49 am, Nikolay Ananiev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > YES drawable-hdpi-v6 works for me too. I'll use it in my next release as
> >> a
> >> > workaround
> >> > Thanks Artem!
>
> >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Artem Petakov <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > This will sound crazy, but -v6 works for me. There must be a strange
> >> reason
> >> > > why this works, or maybe there is a subtle reason why this workaround
> >> does
> >> > > not work. Can anyone confirm?
>
> >> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Artem Petakov <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > >> Ah, that's too bad. Bugs happen.
>
> >> > >> I am trying to understand the solution... Somehow having a -v5
> >> version in
> >> > >> there does not help (as webmonkey reported). I don't have my head
> >> around
> >> > >> this fully, but I think Android somehow prefers the regular
> >> "drawable"
> >> > >> directory (which I have for the Cupcake crowd). What is the
> >> recommended set
> >> > >> of drawable directories at this point?
>
> >> > >> Artem
>
> >> > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Dianne Hackborn <
> >> [email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> > >>> Dammit yeah that would be broken.  I'll make sure this is fixed in
> >> the
> >> > >>> next version; for now i guess you will need to include both -v4 and
> >> -v5
> >> > >>> resources.
>
> >> > >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Artem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > >>>> Trying to help by digging up the code.
>
> >> > >>>> I found this:
>
> >>http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en&sa=N&cd=1&ct=rc#uX1GffpyOZk/...
>
> >> > >>>>    // Return true if 'this' can be considered a match for the
> >> > >>>> parameters in
> >> > >>>>    // 'settings'.
> >> > >>>>    // Note this is asymetric.  A default piece of data will match
> >> > >>>> every request
> >> > >>>>    // but a request for the default should not match odd specifics
> >> > >>>>    // (ie, request with no mcc should not match a particular mcc's
> >> > >>>> data)
> >> > >>>>    // settings is the requested settings
> >> > >>>>    inline bool match(const ResTable_config& settings) const {
> >> > >>>> ...
>
> >> > >>>>        if (version != 0) {
> >> > >>>>            if (settings.sdkVersion != 0 && sdkVersion != 0
> >> > >>>>                && sdkVersion != settings.sdkVersion) {
> >> > >>>>                return false;
> >> > >>>>            }
> >> > >>>>            if (settings.minorVersion != 0 && minorVersion != 0
> >> > >>>>                && minorVersion != settings.minorVersion) {
> >> > >>>>                return false;
> >> > >>>>            }
> >> > >>>>        }
> >> > >>>>        return true;
> >> > >>>>   }
>
> >> > >>>> Of course I am not sure where this is used, but I only see an !=
> >> here.
> >> > >>>> Hopefully, this is not the right code. Or perhaps there is new code
> >> in
> >> > >>>> Eclair that is not available yet, that makes this better.
>
> >> > >>>> Thanks for the help.
>
> >> > >>>> Artem
>
> >> > >>>> On Oct 29, 9:12 pm, Artem Petakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >>>> > Dianne, I am sorry to say it also does not work for me. Actually,
> >> we
> >> > >>>> had
> >> > >>>> > made a mistake and originally forgot the v4, which screwed up
> >> Cupcake,
> >> > >>>> but
> >> > >>>> > now we added the v4 (and make no other changes), and it stopped
> >> > >>>> working.
>
> >> > >>>> > Am I missing something? Or is there perhaps a serious problem?
> >> Please
> >> > >>>> reply
> >> > >>>> > back so we can take action -- we need to publish a new APK for
> >> the
> >> > >>>> Cupcake
> >> > >>>> > users, but we can't figure out how to do that without breaking
> >> Eclair.
>
> >> > >>>> > Artem
>
> >> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM, webmonkey <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > >>>> wrote:
>
> >> > >>>> > > Hi Dianne,
>
> >> > >>>> > > The v flag does indeed not work, I am using the Android 2.0 SDK
> >> with
> >> > >>>> > > the following AndroidManifest settings:
>
> >> > >>>> > > <uses-sdk
> >> > >>>> > >    android:minSdkVersion="3"
> >> > >>>> > >     android:targetSdkVersion="5"
> >> > >>>> > > />
>
> >> > >>>> > > Running on a WVGA854 emulator with density 240 and API 5, I get
> >> the
> >> > >>>> > > following results:
>
> >> > >>>> > > drawable-hdpi-v4
>
> >> > >>>> > > is ignored
>
> >> > >>>> > > drawable-hdpi-v5
>
> >> > >>>> > > is ignored, very strange
>
> >> > >>>> > > drawable-hdpi
>
> >> > >>>> > > works, but we can't use that
>
> >> > >>>> > > On Oct 29, 3:45 pm, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>>> > > > I am pretty positive it works.  Nothing changed in 2.0 --
> >> this has
> >> > >>>> been
> >> > >>>> > > the
> >> > >>>> > > > same since 1.0, if the platform's SDK version is < the
> >> resource
> >> > >>>> version,
> >> > >>>> > > > then the resource is ignored.
>
> >> > >>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jeff <[email protected]>
> >> > >>>> wrote:
>
> >> > >>>> > > > > Looks like -v4 flag doesn't work in Android 2.0. Any ideas?
>
> >> > >>>> > > > > On Oct 22, 8:38 am, Nikolay Ananiev <[email protected]>
> >> > >>>> wrote:
> >> > >>>> > > > > > This is how I made my app resolution-independent and with
> >> > >>>> Android 1.5
> >> > >>>> > > > > legacy
> >> > >>>> > > > > > support:
>
> >> > >>>> > > > > > Why did I put my high-dpi images in the drawable-hdpi-v4
> >> > >>>> folder and
> >> > >>>> > > not
> >> > >>>> > > > > in
> >> > >>>> > > > > > drawable-hdpi? Because the Android 1.5 OS can't handle
> >> the
> >> > >>>> -hdpi and
> >> > >>>> > > > > tries
> >> > >>>> > > > > > to use these images instead of the ones in the
> >> res/drawable
> >> > >>>> folder.
> >> > >>>> > > The
> >> > >>>> > > > > -v4
> >> > >>>> > > > > > flag is only meaningful for Android 1.6 and works
> >> perfect.
>
> >> > >>>> > > > --
> >> > >>>> > > > Dianne Hackborn
> >> > >>>> > > > Android framework engineer
> >> > >>>> > > > [email protected]
>
> >> > >>>> > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't
> >> have
> >> > >>>> time to
> >> > >>>> > > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.
> >>  All
> >> > >>>> such
> >> > >>>> > > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and
> >> others
> >> > >>>> can see
> >> > >>>> > > and
> >> > >>>> > > > answer them.
>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> Dianne Hackborn
> >> > >>> Android framework engineer
> >> > >>> [email protected]
>
> >> > >>> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have
> >> time to
> >> > >>> provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All
> >> such
> >> > >>> questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can
> >> see and
> >> > >>> answer them.
>
> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to