Another reason I don't beleive the CLIQ is a good development device:
The CLIQ does not output Log.v() or Log.d() level logging via LogCat.



On Nov 9, 4:39 am, jarkman <jark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dianne - we have a couple of problems on the CLIQ.
>
> In both cases, the APIs are technically working correctly, but the
> resulting user experience is unfortunate, so these may not be exactly
> what you are asking for. But, in case you are interested:
>
> (1) The CLIQ has a lot of contact data (from facebook and so on) that
> is not visible through the Contact APIs. From our user's point of
> view, that results in contacts who simply do not appear in our UI or
> in contacts with phone numbers that we can't see. They see that
> experience as broken.
>
> We have no workaround for that, apart from hoping that that the CLIQ
> moves rapidly to 2.0.
>
> (2) The CLIQ has no LED colour control, so our LED-colour
> configuration UI appears broken to our users. The docs do say that LED
> colour support is optional, but without an API to query for colour
> support we can't take the UI away automatically.
>
> We're fixing that with a special-case CLIQ detector, but that is
> obviously not a good solution in a amrket with a lot of new phones
> appearing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
> On Nov 7, 9:00 pm, Dianne Hackborn <hack...@android.com> wrote:
>
> > Can you give more detail?  The APIs should work the same.  If there are
> > changes, we'd really like to know.
>
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM, nEx.Software
> > <email.nex.softw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > The CLIQ is not representative of a normal Android experience. It is
> > > buggy, half of the components have been replaced by Motorola. They use
> > > their own variants of some APIs.
>
> > > And, I certainly would not recommend it as a user device, personally.
> > > As a user of the CLIQ I have been very, very disappointed.
>
> > > So, if you really want just a testing device I would choose something
> > > the is not as heavily modified. If you also want to use it as your
> > > actual phone, I would choose something less glitchy and more flexible.
>
> > > On Nov 7, 11:10 am, Dianne Hackborn <hack...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM, nEx.Software
> > > > <email.nex.softw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > The CLIQ has 1.5 loaded, and it is NOT a good development phone. Trust
> > > > > me.
>
> > > > What is wrong with it?  Fwiw, one of our goals is that all Android
> > > > compatible phones should also allow for the full standard development
> > > > environment.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > > Android framework engineer
> > > > hack...@android.com
>
> > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see
> > > and
> > > > answer them.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> > --
> > Dianne Hackborn
> > Android framework engineer
> > hack...@android.com
>
> > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
> > answer them.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to