I dont think it's fair to generally badmouth the judging process and with this the winners, too. Many of the winning apps are pretty well done , well polished or at least with unique ideas. Thats much more than the average of all apps in the market. And even there might be cases where an app didn't win even though it might be better than a winning app, you should not generalize this for all the apps. This is not fair imo.
PS: This is not especially for you, Piotr, I just quoted the last msg. On 1 Dez., 22:35, Piotr <[email protected]> wrote: > Look at Market, on ADC2 app comments. > > If MOST of commenting users do not even knew WHERE the MENU button is > ("how to skip an app ?" issue), then you already know, how "highly > proffesional" the judgement process was. > > On 1 Gru, 16:17, Rmac <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So ADC2 was more of a publicity effort than true determination of high > > quality apps. The losers in the contest may have been winners given a > > different random group of judges, and the winners may have lost given > > a different judging process. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
