This is an unbelievable limitation.. Anyone know the reason why SJ & co went this way?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:29 PM, cr0vax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IPhone is not in competition. Sorry but with less than 1% of the > market, Apple isn't a competitor at all. > > And if you consider developping, the fact that you can run only one > third-party app at a time, and that this app cannot go background, > then you understand that you simply have no usefull app at all from > the iPhone community. > > On 16 avr, 15:28, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Android User Display:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRxsxynZV8I > > > > Games and display enhancements won't provide the user with "Needed" > > functionality, > > > > What applications can provide Android with superior user > > functionality, not available elsewhere? > > > > A separate issue: > > > > iPhone is in direct competion to corner this market, and preclude a > > free user interface. What functional applications can be provided to > > make Android more desireable than iPhone? Not following iPhone and > > mimicking their functionality, but leading and producing functionality > > that iPhone does not provide. > > > -- take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://mobeegal.in find stuff closer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
