Isn't Android licensed to all under Apache License 2.0? So wouldn't all Android applications have these requirements (e.g., section 4)?
I just feel like there is or should be a common solution to this issue without turning up the attorney meter. An example from someone in the know would be awesome. Cheers, Wes On Sep 7, 3:44 pm, Mark Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wescorp wrote: > > At this point I've an application where I've created all the source > > code and presume to own the application outright. For now, I plan to > > keep the source code proprietary. I'm considering extending the > > application using thehttp://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/ > > Photostream example. > > > How would this effect my proprietary source code rights? > > The Photostream app appears to be licensed under Apache License 2.0, > which allows integration with proprietary source code and distribution > of the combined work under a proprietary license. There are some > specific actions you will need to take, however (e.g., section 4). > > If you are new to open source licensing, I strongly encourage you to > read up on the subject, and perhaps discuss the matter with qualified > legal counsel. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com > Warescription: All titles, revisions, & ebook formats, just $35/year --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
