Sorry, if the intent was not to be patronizing, it escaped me. Generally when one refers to an elementary and well-known fact in an instructional manner, their intention is to convey the impression that the recipient wasn't aware of the fact. If your intention was otherwise, you have my apology for the misunderstanding.
You are especially invited to contribute your thoughts on the actual topic under discussion. On Feb 23, 2:02 pm, Shane Isbell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks. The Wikipedia had no listing for "patronization" so I was > > unable to reciprocate. > > Somehow I think reciprocation of intelligent conversation would elude you, > regardless of where it is found. Yes, best for you to stick to patronizing. > > Shane --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
