No problem. I wasn't intending to be patronizing. I was merely agreeing with you. If you have a free version of the app, then if is even remotely close to the paid version, ppl won't buy.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, if the intent was not to be patronizing, it escaped me. > Generally when one refers to an elementary and well-known fact in an > instructional manner, their intention is to convey the impression that > the recipient wasn't aware of the fact. If your intention was > otherwise, you have my apology for the misunderstanding. > > You are especially invited to contribute your thoughts on the actual > topic under discussion. > > On Feb 23, 2:02 pm, Shane Isbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks. The Wikipedia had no listing for "patronization" so I was > > > unable to reciprocate. > > > > Somehow I think reciprocation of intelligent conversation would elude > you, > > regardless of where it is found. Yes, best for you to stick to > patronizing. > > > > Shane > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
