Joe wrote: > And why can we not have both? I am presuming there may be technical reasons it is impossible or impractical to implement, as I explained in my earlier post.
I may be wrong. I hope I am wrong. My vote of -1 is based on the assumption that I am not wrong. > Your argument really does not hold water. You are certainly welcome to your opinions. > Sorry if this is a bit rantish, but I have yet to understand why > anyone would stand behind the current 'copy protection', defend it, or > even rationalize it. I don't. Which is why I don't want the ADP1 made unusable for firmware development just to chase a few priced copy-protected apps. > Devs have paid alot of money for > their ADP1 phones, and *gasp* might even use it for day to day use, > and might even want to buy something like bettercut (copy protected), > or a game or two to make it that much better. Don't get me wrong. I sincerely hope the ADP1 is capable, someday, of supporting both firmware development and the then-current rendition of Android Market copy protection. I just have the sneaking suspicion it may not be possible in any reasonable timeframe, and I do not want to see firmware development hampered because you want "a game or two". -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com Android Training in Sweden -- http://www.sotrium.com/training.php --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
