The same topic is located there too -> http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?tid=077d19f31873da3f&hl=en
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's not easy for someone to say "There will be such feature for ADP1". > JBQ has already made it clear that in his job he doesn't have oversight > over the complete 1.1 build, functionality plans, and release dates. > These probably limited to certain groups (if they exist at all). > > It seems pretty clear by now that the people from Google on this list > are the engineers who are answering questions when they can. This isn't > a hangout for all Google Android employees, this isn't a list that > Google see as a place to answer developers questions on any and all > Android topics, and this isn't a place where any kind of vote, protest, > or anything similar is going to get noticeable results. > > If you want to report something to Google then the Market forums seem to > be as close as we can get to the best channel to do this. The URL is; > > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market > > Al. > - Show quoted text - > > > > vendor wrote: > > They are working on APD 1.1 . We know a little about this update. It > > is like RC 33, but for ADP , but there are still questions and JBQ did > > not confirm the feature "protected/paid apps". It`s easy someone from > > google to say: "There will be such feature for ADP1" and this > > discussion is over, but until then... > > > > > > A even simpler method would be to have each dev sign their APKs > > with a > > > > license key (think google maps style), which, when purchased would > > > > store the key on the user's account. When run (or installed) the APK > > > > can call to the server and see if the current user actually has that > > > > key in their user account, else, it will not allow installation. Same > > > > concept, but does not even need encryption. > > > > > > This method is good when the app needs constant > > internet connection like the Maps, but for other apps like games and > > etc, this is not a solution, because they will be "pinging" the server > > to check every time for the keys. But anyway there are more solutions > > suitable for better security and ADP 1. Just have to be implemented. > > > > P.S. There is one feature which affects all users and it is the > > problem that you can install apps only in the main memory which is not > > enough > > -> > http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/803fe73023a24536/ > > One solution is to make virtual partition and etc. and by making a > > virtual partition for this problem, the above one will be solved > > almost automatically. > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > They're already working on this (as JBQ has said on numerous > > occasions) > > > > Voting will not make things magically happen, waiting is all you > > can do. > > > > Al. > > > - Show quoted text - > > vendor.net <http://vendor.net> wrote: > > > Please vote for +1 if you agree that google should do something to > > > allow developers with ADP1 to access the paid and protected apps > and > > > finally to release the new firmware we all are waiting for ADP 1.1 > . > > > In meantime we can help each others when we disable the "copy > > > protection" in our free apps at the store with the logo *ADP OPEN* > > > > > > You can see these topics as well: > > > > > > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?tid=22e4b0e8eda7c51e&hl=en > > < > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?tid=22e4b0e8eda7c51e&hl=en > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/2b746b6bbf2b0e2e > > > > > > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?tid=107185eea74e4005&hl=en > > < > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?tid=107185eea74e4005&hl=en > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * > > > > ====== > > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the > > company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, > > 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. > > > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not > > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's > > subsidiaries. > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * > > ====== > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the > company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, > 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's > subsidiaries. > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
