Al, great job! I'm adding some features to my game and can't wait to
publish it on AndAppStore as well! :)

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I've added a "Pre-Release" area to AndAppStore where you can list apps
> that are not ready for the prime time. Hopefully this fit what you guys
> want to see.
>
> If you list an app and submit a release you can now mark it as "Public
> Release", "Release Candidate", "Beta", or "Alpha". Anything marked
> "Public Release" gets shown in all the normal places, anything marked as
> an RC, Beta, or Alpha gets listed in an pre-release area accessed by
> logging in and clicking on the "Pre-Release Apps" menu on the right of
> the page.
>
> There are plenty of warnings that these are pre-release apps, users can
> leave comments, developers can reply to the comments, but long threads
> are not possible (it's a simple comment & reply system).
>
> All feedback on this is, as always, welcome.
>
> Al.
> http://andappstore.com/
>
> Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
>> Make it expire or whatever. But the app testing idea is great. Already
>> an app got submitted and it was tested atleast by myself and given
>> feedback. Ofcourse it would be fantastic, if more people test and
>> provide feedback.
>>
>> Check it out here:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/android-app-distribution
>>
>> take care,
>> Muthu Ramadoss.
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91.98403.48914
>> http://androidrocks.googlecode.com - Android Consulting.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:34 PM, [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Completely agree.
>>
>>     Right now its a difficult situation.
>>
>>     Either :
>>     a) Release a paid app, close your eyes, cross your fingers and hope
>>     there are no bugs - but something always goes wrong -> cue one star
>>     reviews.
>>     b) Release a free app - get lots of downloads, more generous reviews,
>>     but users resistant to ever upgrade to a paid app when they have
>>     something they are already happy with. e.g. picSay, astro both have
>>     huge user bases, but many comments on market indicate users would
>>     never consider upgrading to paid.
>>
>>     I agree a beta section would be a good middle ground - but could we
>>     make beta versions expire so people who don't actually help with the
>>     testing don't get copies of apps for free.
>>
>>     Alex
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Mar 16, 1:58 pm, Jason Van Anden <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>     > I am thrilled that this idea is of interest.
>>     >
>>     > I imagine a "Beta" section of the market solving a number of
>>     existing
>>     > problems ... first and foremost to exist as a sandbox for
>>     developers and
>>     > users to play nice together with the mutual understanding that
>>     this will
>>     > produce awesome software (while not contaminating the "Alpha"
>>     market with
>>     > sub-prime software).
>>     >
>>     > In order for this to occur, it seems to me that it would be a
>>     good idea for
>>     > there to be some sort of constitution between these two
>>     interested parties,
>>     > so it does not become a place for unscrupulous developers
>>     stealing ideas or
>>     > a welfare program for cheap users.
>>     >
>>     > Not to rain on the parade, but I am not sure this needs a
>>     different "group",
>>     > "discuss" is underutilized and it seems to have Google's ear, so
>>     why fix
>>     > something that ain't broke?
>>     >
>>     > i++
>>     >
>>     > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Muthu Ramadoss
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
>>     >
>>     > > Who wouldn't want a Promotion?? I'm all for it :D
>>     >
>>     > > take care,
>>     > > Muthu Ramadoss.
>>     >
>>     > >http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91.98403.48914
>>     > >http://androidrocks.googlecode.com- Android Consulting.
>>     >
>>     > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Al Sutton
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> Thanks for the vote of confidence :).
>>     >
>>     > >> My aim was to make a group which would discuss all distribution
>>     > >> mechanisms as opposed to being limited to just Market
>>     >
>>     > >> Muthu, would you object to me adding you as a group manager?
>>     >
>>     > >> Al.
>>     >
>>     > >> Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> > I trust Al would do a better job ;), so let this be the
>>     main group:
>>     >
>>     > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-app-distribution
>>     >
>>     > >> > take care,
>>     > >> > Muthu Ramadoss.
>>     >
>>     > >> >http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914
>>     > >> >http://androidrocks.googlecode.com- Android Consulting.
>>     >
>>     > >> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Stoyan Damov
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > >> > <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     So which one do I join???
>>     >
>>     > >> >     On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Al Sutton
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > >> >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > lol.... two minds, one idea :).
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
>>     > >> >     >> Here you go:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>http://groups.google.com/group/androidmarket/
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >> take care,
>>     > >> >     >> Muthu Ramadoss.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914
>>     > >> >     >>http://androidrocks.googlecode.com- Android Consulting.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Al Sutton
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > >> >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     > >> >     >> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
>>     > >> wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     I think there's enough discussion for just an
>>     android-market
>>     > >> >     >>     group, the
>>     > >> >     >>     beta discussion could be within that.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     Al.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     > We can create android-market-beta discussion
>>     group for
>>     > >> >     app testing.
>>     > >> >     >>     > What do you folks think?
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     >     On Mar 16, 2009 5:18 PM, "whitemice"
>>     > >> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     > >> >     >>     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>     > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     > >> >     >>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > >> >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     > >> >     >>     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > >> >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     >     Not sure what the recommended way of doing
>>     this at the
>>     > >> >     >>     moment would
>>     > >> >     >>     >     be.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     >     I was going to launch my app as “MyAppName
>>     ALPHA” (to
>>     > >> >     >>     discourage non-
>>     > >> >     >>     >     enthusiasts) and fill the app with
>>     > >> feedback-to-developer
>>     > >> >     >>     buttons.  My
>>     > >> >     >>     >     app is quite complex and would require a
>>     number of
>>     > >> >     >>     iterations to iron
>>     > >> >     >>     >     out any potential usability issues.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     >     OT: A beta program sounds like a good idea.
>>     > >> >     >>     >     I can imagine the “Google way” of doing
>>     this would be
>>     > >> >     via a
>>     > >> >     >>     website
>>     > >> >     >>     >     that offers a consistent way of handling
>>     developer
>>     > >> >     feedback,
>>     > >> >     >>     feature
>>     > >> >     >>     >     requests and bug reports (star ratings
>>     from retarded
>>     > >> >     13 year
>>     > >> >     >>     olds are
>>     > >> >     >>     >     useless at this stage).  Perhaps members
>>     of such a site
>>     > >> >     >>     could act as a
>>     > >> >     >>     >     small user group to do reviews,
>>     recommendations and
>>     > >> >     >>     highlight bad
>>     > >> >     >>     >     apples before they graduate to the market.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     >     However, I can see no specific reason why
>>     this would
>>     > >> >     have to
>>     > >> >     >>     be done
>>     > >> >     >>     >     by Google themselves.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     --
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     * Written an Android App? - List it at
>>     > >> >    http://andappstore.com/*
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     ======
>>     > >> >     >>     Funky Android Limited is registered in England &
>>     Wales with
>>     > >> the
>>     > >> >     >>     company number  6741909. The registered head
>>     office is Kemp
>>     > >> >     House,
>>     > >> >     >>     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     >>     The views expressed in this email are those of
>>     the author
>>     > >> >     and not
>>     > >> >     >>     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
>>     > >> >     associates, or it's
>>     > >> >     >>     subsidiaries.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > --
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > * Written an Android App? - List it
>>     athttp://andappstore.com/* <http://andappstore.com/*>
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > ======
>>     > >> >     > Funky Android Limited is registered in England &
>>     Wales with the
>>     > >> >     > company number  6741909. The registered head office
>>     is Kemp House,
>>     > >> >     > 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>>     >
>>     > >> >     > The views expressed in this email are those of the
>>     author and not
>>     > >> >     > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
>>     associates, or
>>     > >> it's
>>     > >> >     > subsidiaries.
>>     >
>>     > >> --
>>     >
>>     > >> * Written an Android App? - List it
>>     athttp://andappstore.com/* <http://andappstore.com/*>
>>     >
>>     > >> ======
>>     > >> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
>>     > >> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp
>>     House,
>>     > >> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>>     >
>>     > >> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
>>     > >> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates,
>>     or it's
>>     > >> subsidiaries.
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>
>
> --
>
> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
>
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to