Hi,

Hmm, it's hard to tell -

Did Google Pull a Neven with Enkin?

http://androidguys.com/?p=2174

Regards

On Mar 20, 9:50 pm, Yuri Ammosov - Sadko Mobile <[email protected]>
wrote:
> What happened to Enkin?
>
> YA
>
> On Mar 20, 10:15 am, gjs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > ADC1 also served as a platform for Google to harvest cool ideas from
> > developers, eg: enkin -
>
> >http://www.enkin.net
>
> > - as you agreed to allow Google to create apps derived from ideas in
> > your submission ( or something to that effect )
>
> > I think ADC gives you that chance to showcase something to Google,
> > over and above applications that may actually be immediately useful or
> > commercially viable.
>
> > To me it was a chance to 'shoot for the stars' even if it wasn't
> > actually immediately practical.
>
> > If ADC II is (just) based on performance of the existing apps in the
> > Market, then it is just retrospectively rewarding whats already been
> > successfully done - and Shop Savvy, Breadcrumbs, The Weather Channel
> > etc etc etc may as well resubmit their original applications for ADC
> > II...
>
> > I hope it retains some of the spirit of the first rounds.
>
> > Regards
>
> > On Mar 20, 4:46 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > To me the best metric of quality and user friendly capabilities is
> > > people wanting to use the app, hence why I can see a Market position
> > > based competition making sense.
>
> > > Al.
>
> > > Ivan Soto wrote:
> > > > If my application sells for like $.99 and the top seller is selling
> > > > around 600 to 1000 a month, a lot of developer would be spending $1500
> > > > just to make themselves to the top. The price would be more than that
> > > > amount.
>
> > > > Just a thought.
>
> > > > I don't like that idea. I really prefer a challenge that favor towards
> > > > the quality and user friendly capabilities.
>
> > > > my 2 cents.
>
> > > > Ivan Soto Fernandez
> > > > Web Developer
> > > >http://ivansotof.com
>
> > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dan Morrill <[email protected]
> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > > >     We have considered and are considering ideas along those lines.
> > > >      That is *not* to say that that's what we are going to do, so
> > > >     don't take it as confirmation. :)  But yes, many different
> > > >     structures are on the table.
>
> > > >     - Dan
>
> > > >     On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]
> > > >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > > >         Dan,
>
> > > >         Thanks for the clarification.
>
> > > >         How about making the ADC II a set of awards which are given to
> > > >         the best
> > > >         selling apps in each category each month for the next couple
> > > >         of years.
> > > >         This would allow the Android user community to vote on what is
> > > >         good for
> > > >         them, give developers a reason to push their apps to the limit
> > > >         of what
> > > >         they can do, and allow Google to focus the prizes on groups
> > > >         delivering
> > > >         what people want.
>
> > > >         Just a thought.
>
> > > >         Al.
>
> > > >         Dan Morrill wrote:
> > > >         > Oops.  Looks like that page was collateral damage when we
> > > >         did the move
> > > >         > to developer.android.com <http://developer.android.com>
> > > >         <http://developer.android.com>.  We're
> > > >         > looking into it; thanks for pointing it out.  At any rate
> > > >         the content
> > > >         > that would be there refers only to the first Developer
> > > >         Challenge.
>
> > > >         > Regarding the second Developer Challenge, it definitely
> > > >         isn't canceled
> > > >         > but we haven't announced plans for it yet.  We said we would
> > > >         by last
> > > >         > year (sorry about that), but we're still working on how to
> > > >         structure
> > > >         > it.  The world is quite a bit different now than it was when
> > > >         we ran
> > > >         > the first ADC, so we want to make sure the new
> > > >         rules/structure make
> > > >         > sense, and we are of course taking into consideration 
> > > > everyone's
> > > >         > experiences with the first ADC.  The second ADC will
> > > >         definitely not be
> > > >         > a clone of the first ADC.
>
> > > >         > We expect to have all this finalized and announce rules 
> > > > within a
> > > >         > couple months.  The event itself will likely run in the
> > > >         second half of
> > > >         > the year.
>
> > > >         > - Dan
>
> > > >         > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Al Sutton
> > > >         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > >         > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > >         wrote:
>
> > > >         >     Very very recently though. Googling for "android
> > > >         developer challenge"
> > > >         >     still brings up the 404ed page as the top result.
>
> > > >         >     Al.
>
> > > >         >     Anonymous Anonymous wrote:
> > > >         >     >http://developer.android.com/
> > > >         >     > try in here.. its moved i guess
>
> > > >         >     > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Eelke Folmer
> > > >         >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > >         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > >         >     > <mailto:[email protected]
> > > >         <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
> > > >         <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> > > >         >     wrote:
>
> > > >         >     >     This (http://code.google.com/android/adc.html)
> > > >          gives a
> > > >         >     404 which is
> > > >         >     >     weird for a google site.
> > > >         >     >     Is this challenge cancelled? I hope not......
>
> > > >         >     --
>
> > > >         >     * Written an Android App? - List it at
> > > >        http://andappstore.com/*
>
> > > >         >     ======
> > > >         >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales
> > > >         with the
> > > >         >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is
> > > >         Kemp House,
> > > >         >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> > > >         >     The views expressed in this email are those of the
> > > >         author and not
> > > >         >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
> > > >         associates, or it's
> > > >         >     subsidiaries.
>
> > > >         --
>
> > > >         * Written an Android App? - List it athttp://andappstore.com/*
>
> > > >         ======
> > > >         Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> > > >         company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp 
> > > > House,
> > > >         152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> > > >         The views expressed in this email are those of the author and 
> > > > not
> > > >         necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates,
> > > >         or it's
> > > >         subsidiaries.
>
> > > --
>
> > > * Written an Android App? - List it athttp://andappstore.com/*
>
> > > ======
> > > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> > > company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> > > 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> > > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> > > subsidiaries.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to